Tuesday, May 28, 2019

King Solomons Mines Essays -- Henry Rider Haggard

Henry Rider Haggard sets out to create an epic tale of courage, a dyspnoeal drama that attempts to capture, within its limits, the universal spirit of adventure. He appeals in particular to the proverbial young male that seeks an audacious inspiration in life by which to model his own. He entices his readers because his motives lie simply in his desire to entertain, to delight, and to enthrall anyone with a prolific imagination. However, this purely entertaining account of an eclectic and adventuresome third clearly manifests its motives by the simple elimination ambiguity, leaving little or nothing to the whims of infinite interpretation. As it is, e trulything within the novel seems to have the intention of universe taken with a grain of salt. Haggard knew his audience, a pretentious and nationalistic society bent on world domination or at the very least determined to reduce the rest of the world to nothing more than a means to meet their desires. And with these precepts in min d, Haggard creates a fantastical tale, fetching heed of what is socially acceptable and what is not, all the while maintaining western superiority over the rest of the world.The fact of the matter is, that I thought that the best object would be to tell the story in a plain straightforward mannerI cannot help thinking that simple things are always the about impressive, books are easier to understand when they are written in plain language, though I have perhaps no right to set up an picture on such a matter. (Haggard 6).In this introduction/disclaimer, Allan Quatermain as our narrator, comes clean with his intentions, providing a stabilizing retrospective for the ensuing epitaph. He seems well aware of the faint-hearted line between words intended for fiction and those intended for controversy. And by designating the jolly old Quatermain as narrator, Haggard vicariously endear himself to his readers by exuding a simple humility in light of his grander than grand expos, all the while disposing of the pretense intrinsic to most literary works. Haggard, due to the relative sensitivity of his pendent matter, has no desire to have his novel the target of unwarranted and unwanted social and literary criticism. In that, he makes certain that he reaffirms his intentions of entertainment preferably than controversy.In addition, despite Haggards prevalent use of juxtaposition throughou... ... complexion Twala is described as Twala the One-eyed, the Black, and the Terrible (Haggard 118), not coincidentally the only true Black among them. The temporary hookup is action-packed, carried along by one dramatic scene after another in which we as readers are witness to amazing feats of strength, bravery, and guile, leaving little or no time for readers to dwell much on any aspect of the novel except the plot. Haggard even goes so far as to devour a divisive source of comic relief in the form of Good, whom we see deified by the Kukuanas, who delight in the sight of his bare legs, transparent eye, half-haired face, and vanishing teeth (118 Haggard). By the end of the novel we see all strings tied, imparting a sense of conclusive triumph without controversy. Haggards audience gets exactly what it wants, the macabre evil doers are vanquished peace, justice, and tranquility are returned to Kukuana land our deserving white and pseudo-white heroes are the benefactors of the plunders of Solomons fabled mines and we as readers are left thoroughly entertained. oeuvre CitedHaggard, H. Rider. King Solomons Mines. 1989. Oxford, New YorkOxford World Classics 1998

No comments:

Post a Comment

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.